A Cheryl Watson’s Tuning Letter Reprint on Reducing CPU in IBM’s Tailored Fit Pricing’s Enterprise Consumption
Depending on your situation, IBM’s Tailored Fit Pricing (TFP) can have benefits and/or drawbacks. However, from a performance perspective, TFP opens up an array of options for reducing your MSU consumption. Tuning actions that had no financial impact in a R4HA environment become relevant again.
In this reprint of an article from Cheryl Watson’s Tuning Letter 2020 No. 4, IntelliMagic’s Todd Havekost and Watson & Walker’s Mario Bezzi and Frank Kyne summarize tuning actions that you can take at the infrastructure level.
Also showcased is the importance of aggressively identifying and taking action on ‘rogue’ workloads.
With IBM’s announcement replacing Country Multiplex Pricing (CMP) for new customers and phasing existing CMP customers without a ‘non-expiring contract’ to TFP by the end of 2024, understanding how TFP will impact your software costs is more relevant than ever before.
To access this article, please complete the form.
[This document is reprinted with permission from Watson and Walker. It originally appeared in Cheryl Watson’s Tuning Letter 2020 No. 4.)
Complete this form to download the article
z/OS Performance Monitoring Best Practices for 2021
These best practices for z/OS performance monitoring will take your mainframe management from reactive and costly to proactive and efficient in no time.
Reporting on Tailored Fit Pricing Enterprise Consumption
Discover ways to track your MSU consumption, and how to identify and investigate situations where your actual consumption is out of line with the expected consumption.
How to use Processor Cache Optimization to Reduce z Systems Costs
Optimizing processor cache can significantly reduce CPU consumption for your workload on modern z Systems processors.