Most of us can identify with situations where we are deluged with data, and we face challenges wading through it all and pulling out the value. A scenario that comes to mind is the proliferation of TV shows now available. As if the shows on the hundreds of networks available on cable TV weren’t enough, the challenge is compounded by the plethora of programming now available through streaming services.
Current cable TV “GUIDE” functionality (where you scroll page by page through a list of hundreds of shows) certainly doesn’t cut it. The streaming services attempt to provide some help through lists of shows divided into categories like drama or comedy, but unless you know specifically what you are looking for in advance, their search capabilities still leave a lot to be desired.
Analyzing CICS Performance
Mainframe performance analysts can consider themselves fortunate to have access to more extensive metrics than on any other platform, but often find themselves facing a similar uphill battle trying to sift through gigabytes if not terabytes of SMF data produced daily at their sites. This task of deriving value from massive quantities of data can be particularly challenging for analysts charged with effectively analyzing CICS performance from the SMF 110 CICS Monitoring Facility data.
It is clear this cannot be accomplished by analysts sifting through tabular data presented in countless static reports. To successfully achieve this, there are conceptually two ways you need to put the power of the computer to work for you.
One is for the computer to be automatically checking key metrics associated with the thousands of elements in your infrastructure to identify hidden risks to availability.
A second is to exploit a powerful graphical user interface to dynamically interact with the data, leveraging context-sensitive drilldowns enabling you to determine based on the current chart what the next logical analytical step should be.
In this blog I am going to focus on that second aspect, the analytical value provided as a highly flexible user interface makes data easily accessible.
Analyzing Time Measurements for CICS Transactions
Of the nearly 400 fields in the SMF 110-1 records, approximately 100 represent various time measurements (e.g., CPU, response, wait), so that is clearly an important focus for analysis. As a starting point, one might choose top transactions by total CPU consumed (typically called “CPU intensity”) or by transaction volume. The latter appears in the screenshot below generated using IntelliMagic Vision.
From here, we can drill down to examine the response time of a specific transaction over the indicated time interval, divided into the commonly-defined categories for CICS response times.
The ability to select other metrics for potential correlation can also facilitate analysis. In the following example, the report was customized to add “transaction rate” (the blue-green line) on the right axis (any variable could be selected).
Further analysis into the “Total I/O Wait Time” category may be warranted and can be achieved with a single click. In this example, “Wait for Control at end of MRO” constitutes almost all the wait time.
CICS also reports on the components of CPU in great detail, as reflected in the legend of this chart.
“Before and after” analysis (e.g., of the impact of an application release) on CPU per transaction can quickly be determined by converting this into an area chart and selecting any interval in the database for comparison (requiring only a few clicks).
It may be advantageous to begin analysis from the perspective of response times for high volume transactions (as in this example).
Analysis for a selected transaction could continue through drilldowns into response times by CICS regions and/or by z/OS systems (pictured below) to determine if response times varied significantly across the sysplex (in this case response times were generally similar).
Analysis could also begin from the viewpoint of CICS regions, with similar drilldowns including by transaction, response time categories and components, CPU time, z/OS system, etc. (not shown here due to space limitations).
Making CICS Data Manageable
Easy visibility to explore this data and context-sensitive drilldowns for detailed analysis make these metrics readily accessible and positions the analyst to quickly derive value from them.
Whether you’re searching for the right TV show or the response time of certain CICS transactions, you need an easy and effective way to filter out the noise and rapidly find what you’re looking for.
From high level overviews to detailed, intuitive drilldowns, IntelliMagic Vision takes the previously unmanageable quantity of CICS data and makes it manageable. Rather than sifting through page after page or report after report trying to identify the significant data points, your analysis can proceed in a direct and expeditious manner to find key insights and actionable information.
This is one of the key reasons why over the course of my decades-long career spent primarily as a performance analyst I found IntelliMagic Vision to be a game-changing tool enabling me to perform analysis at the highest level.
See more on IntelliMagic Vision’s CICS reporting here.
Top ‘IntelliMagic zAcademy’ Webinars of 2023
View the top rated mainframe performance webinars of 2023 covering insights on the z16, overcoming skills gap challenges, understanding z/OS configuration, and more!
Tuning TCB Switches for CICS Cost Savings
CPU 'tuning' exercises often focus on unnecessary TCB switches. In this case, changes made that reduced TCB switch time saved a ton of CPU - up to 2,000 seconds.
Best Practices in CICS Performance Analysis (Transactions and Statistics) | IntelliMagic zAcademy
This session will introduce you to several best practices for enhancing your analysis of CICS Transaction and Statistics data.